logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.01.23 2016고정674
업무상횡령
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the president of the "D", who is a sanatorium for private persons with disabilities in the Guluri City C.

On November 28, 2006, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Defendant on November 28, 2006 with the victim E, who is a 1st degree disabled person with interest on the basic recipient’s living, to use the Defendant’s 4.50,00 won of the subsidies, such as basic living cost, disability allowance, etc. to be paid monthly to the victim in the old viewing, as the residence and food expenses of the victim.

After that, the victim was hospitalized at the G hospital from March 30, 2010 to April 30, 201, from May 3, 2010 to August 19, 201, from the H hospital from October 5, 2010 to November 4, 2010, from the I hospital from November 9, 2010 to December 20, 201, from the I hospital from December 20, 201 to the I Hospital from January 20, 201, from the H hospital from February 1, 201 to April 20, 201 to the Gu University from February 3, 201 to the date on which the victim was hospitalized from the Gu University from the date on which the victim was hospitalized until December 23, 2012 to the date on which the victim was hospitalized.

From March 30, 2010 to July 8, 2013, the Defendant embezzled subsidies of KRW 14,130,681 out of subsidies paid to the victim during the period of hospitalized treatment at H hospitals, etc. as indicated in the list of crimes in attached Table 18,56,081, as stated in the list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. A passbook of each E, the details of subsidies, and the details of non-transfer of funds in each E through viewing;

1. In the investigation report (E’s resident registration abstract and submission of an adult post-verification), internal investigation report (E’s analysis), investigation report (D facility status table and E-related data), internal investigation report (as to confirmation of the medical expenses of H hospital), investigation report (as to confirmation of the medical expenses of H hospital), the Defendant and the defense counsel obtained exemption from the amount to be paid as victim E medical expenses according to the sisterhood alliance between D and H hospital, and used the said money as D operating expenses, and thus, they do not constitute “other person’s property” and the victim’s admission contract is maintained.

arrow