Plaintiff and appellant
Plaintiff 1 and 14 others (Attorney Go Jae-hwan, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)
Defendant, Appellant
The Chairman of the National Labor Relations Commission
Intervenor joining the Defendant
Mo Automobile Co., Ltd. (Attorney Lee Dong-chul, Counsel for defendant-appellant)
Conclusion of Pleadings
January 29, 2008
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2006Guhap28055 Decided July 10, 2007
Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.
Purport of claim and appeal
The decision of the first instance court shall be revoked. On July 12, 2006, the Central Labor Relations Commission revoked the new trial decision made between the Plaintiffs and the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) on July 12, 2005 regarding unfair dismissal and unfair labor practice relief application cases.
Reasons
The reasoning for this Court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) by adding “the head office” to “231” following the third of the first instance judgment; and (b) by adding “the 9th of the 9th of the 13th of the 9th of the 19th 13 of the 9th 13 of the 9th 1990s to “the planned product”; and (c) as such, by applying Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance is just, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.
Judges Park Jong-dae (Presiding Judge)