(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2013.12.11 2013고단307

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2013.12.11 2013고단307

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, Defendant B's imprisonment with prison labor of six months, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of four months.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s sole criminal conduct knew of the fact that the victim E (n, 47 years of age and 47 years of age) and the victim E was hedging from November 2012, and around June 2013, Defendant A knew of the fact that the victim E was living together with the other male victim F (the age of 51), followed the victim E, and forced the victim E to leave the victim and take the victim in writing.

On October 19, 2013, at around 17:45, the Defendant discovered E and the victim F, who were engaged in harvesting fish at the top field in front of a collection center located in Gohapcheon-gun G, Gyeongcheon-gun, and was prepared in advance, assaulted the victim F, by spreading the red powder amount in the face of the victim F twice.

B. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury with a deadly weapon, etc.) has not been prosecuted for a separate crime of assault against the Defendant, when and at the same time, when and at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, when and at the face of the victim E, inferred the victim E once, and sculging the red powder amount into the face of the victim E;

The victim E, who deducteds the head of the family in his possession of the victim E, was injured by two times the part of the victim E, but the head was once, and the part of the victim E, who was in need of approximately three weeks of treatment, was sleeped by the victim E.

C. On October 19, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the destruction and damage, etc. of a deadly weapon, etc.) stated that around 18:00 on October 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) discovered a H spacker truck, which was the victim F owned by the victim E; (b) 2 spacks off two spackers between the front glass of the said cargo vehicle and the repair cost; and (c) there is no evidence to acknowledge the amount equivalent to the market value of the damaged smartphone.

3. The amount of money to be distributed.

참조조문

-폭력행위 등 처벌에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-청주지방법원 2017.06.22 2017고정26

-춘천지방법원 2016.04.27 2014노1099

-춘천지방법원 2014.12.02 2014고단611

-대구지방법원 2014.01.16 2013고단6070

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.07.04 2014고정888