Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 15:20 on June 21, 2018, driven a B-Whn-Wn-Wn-Wn-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by witnesses D in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Application of the report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, the actual condition survey report, on-site photographs, and the statutes governing vehicle estimates;

1. Relevant Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel held on the necessity, etc. of relief measures under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that “The physical damage of the damaged vehicle was insignificant at the time of the accident, as well as the traffic hazard and obstacle, such as scattering on the road, etc., did not immediately stop and rescue after the accident as prescribed in Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act. Even if the measures prescribed in the above Act were necessary, the Defendant, even if he and the driver and the driver of the victimized vehicle were in need of the measures, was leaving the scene where he tried to bring about a mobile phone to report the accident, and the necessary measures were fully taken after the accident as prescribed in Article

However, in full view of the following circumstances, the defendant can have become aware of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court.