The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged of this case was leased to the victim F, who was a doctor of the second, fourth, and fifth floor of the E Hospital building in Busan, Busan, which was owned by the Defendant, and the victim F, who was engaged in the same business with G, who did not receive any deposit and monthly rent from G, and the victim was able to submit to the court a letter of promise to pay the monthly rent even if he did not receive any deposit and monthly rent.

On December 22, 2010, the Defendant entered “F” as “F” at the building of the above E Hospital, and entered “F” at the bottom of the G, on the top of the M&C, 1.5 million won monthly management expenses, 1.5 million won, 1.5 million won, additional tax, 9.5 million won, monthly house tax of KRW 10450,000,0000,000 won, monthly rent of KRW 26,50,000,000, and KRW 36,450,000.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations.

On January 26, 2011, the Defendant submitted a forged document to a public official who is aware of the forgery at the Busan District Court's civil petition office as if it was duly formed.

2. The evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor alone is difficult to view that the facts charged in the instant case, which the Defendant signed the victim’s name next to the victim’s name and exercised the victim’s name by forging and using the victim’s name, is sufficiently proven beyond reasonable doubt, and there is no other evidence to

3. According to the conclusion, since the facts charged in the instant case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, the Defendant is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment is publicly announced under Article 58