beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s disposition of business suspension against the Plaintiff on November 25, 2013 is revoked.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a person who is operating B architect office.
B. The Plaintiff’s on-site investigation and inspection related to the approval of use of a building was designated as the special prosecutor, such as a field investigation and inspection, in relation to the approval of use of the building (hereinafter “instant building”) from the Yacheon-do Building Association in Jeonnam-do, and conducted an on-site investigation and inspection (hereinafter “the instant on-site investigation”) of the instant building as indicated in the said table. The Plaintiff prepared a report for approval for use investigation and inspection to the effect that all matters of the investigation are satisfied and do not differ from the permitted design documents, etc. and submitted it to the Y-do Mayor on the basis of the said report.
A multi-family house CD DD CD D on August 11, 201 on January 7, 2011, 201, the date of approval for the use of the date of the on-site investigation of the building site (net City building owner) is the owner of the building; November 25, 2011, the fourth multi-family house EF on the fourth floor on November 16, 2011; GH on the fourth floor on November 25, 2011; November 14, 2011; the multi-family house GH on the fourth floor on the fourth floor on November 25, 2011; the multi-family house IJ on November 25, 2011;
The plaintiff performed the design and supervision of the plaintiff's multi-family house as shown in the attached Form 2. The plaintiff performed the design work of the multi-family house with M, N,O, P, Q, Q, R, S, T, and U as the owner of the building. The plaintiff performed the supervision of the multi-family house with V, W, T, and X as the owner of the building, and prepared and submitted a report that the building he supervised by the defendant was constructed in conformity with the construction permit.
Unlike the contents of the building permit through a joint inspection conducted on January 9, 2013 with public officials belonging to the Seocheon-si, the Defendant’s business suspension against the Plaintiff has increased the number of households among the instant buildings, and L church buildings.