1. The Defendant’s disposition of business suspension against the Plaintiff on November 25, 2013 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an architect who operates B architect office.

B. On-site investigation and inspection of the Plaintiff related to the approval of use of the building, the Plaintiff was designated as the special prosecutor, such as a field investigation and inspection related to the approval of use of the building listed below (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”) from the Magyang-do Building Society in Magyang-do, Jeonyang-do, and conducted a field investigation and inspection of the instant building (hereinafter referred to as the “instant field investigation”) as described in the said table, and submitted a report for approval of use and inspection to the effect that all matters of the investigation are satisfied and do not differ from the permitted design documents, etc., and the Mayang-do Construction Co., Ltd.

4. A multi-family house of the fourth floor on October 17, 201, 201 (hereinafter referred to as "multi-family house of the fourth floor") on September 28, 201, the date of approval for the use of the multi-family house of the fourth floor on the date of the on-site investigation (hereinafter referred to as the "building owner") building permission date, and on June 17, 201, the multi-family house of the fourth floor on May 12, 2011, HI on May 20, 201, October 7, 2011; hereinafter referred to as the "multi-family house of the fourth floor of the fourth floor of the fourth floor on October 30, 2011; hereinafter referred to as the "multi-family house of the fourth floor of the fourth floor on October 4, 2011; hereinafter referred to as the "multi-family house of the fourth floor on April 19, 2011>

The plaintiff performed the design and supervision of the plaintiff's multi-family house as shown in the attached Table 1. The plaintiff performed the design work of the multi-family house in which P is the owner, performed the supervision over Q and P as the owner of the multi-family house, and prepared and submitted a report that the building he supervised by the defendant was constructed in conformity with the construction permit.

On January 17, 2013, the Defendant confirmed that the number of households of the instant building increased, contrary to the contents of the building permit received through a joint inspection with public officials belonging to Gwangju-si on January 17, 2013.

2.3.