A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 23:56 on April 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of a vehicle while driving a DNA-learning car in front of the “C convenience store” in front of the “C convenience store,” and was under the influence of a vehicle parked in that place; (b) the Defendant received and called the 112 report and requested the Defendant to set the vehicle under the influence of alcohol from the victim F (F) who is a police officer for the racing Police Station E box, the police officer for whom the 112 report was received and called, to drive the vehicle under the influence of alcohol; and (c) upon receipt of the said request, the Defendant provided the Defendant to set the vehicle under the influence of alcohol for the identification and the measurement of alcohol, “I am off, I am off, I am son, I am son, son son, son son son son, and son son son son son son son son son son son son son.”

In the end, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to one copy of internal investigation report (related to the situation of appearance), investigation report (a copy of report on detection of a drinking driver, etc.), one copy of report on detection of a drinking driver, one copy of report on detection of a drinking driver, one copy of report on detection of a drinking driver, one copy of report on use of a drinking gauge, two photographs, two copies of investigation report (Attachment of a report on injury), one copy of investigation report on injury (a confirmation of the fact that a suspect has requested a summary order due to the driving of the instant case), one copy of

1. As to the facts constituting an offense, the Defendant alleged to the effect that he did not have the spirit of drinking at the time of the instant case under Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties) of the same Act, but the records of this case are of mental disability or loss.