1. On March 27, 2019, the Defendant filed a claim for revocation of the dismissal disposition against the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

1. Details of decision on the examination of the petition;

A. The Plaintiff’s appointment process 1) On March 1, 2013, the Plaintiff is the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”).

(1) Although the Plaintiff’s resignation (Evidence 48) was written on January 20, 2018, and was promoted as an associate professor on March 1, 2018, and on February 12, 2018, the appeal review decision (Evidence A 44) specified as “from March 1, 2016 to January 30, 2018,” the written resolution (Evidence A 1) and the Plaintiff’s assertion are recognized as being relevant. However, according to the letter of resignation (Evidence 48), the Plaintiff prepared a resignation letter to resign from the position of the Head of the Educational Affairs Support Office on January 20, 2018, the date on which the said letter of resignation is accepted is unclear. However, the Plaintiff’s appointment of the Department of Education and Support for New School (Evidence 1, 44, 48, and 48, the overall curriculum and the overall curriculum and the general curriculum management of the Plaintiff’s graduate from the C University, the curriculum and the general curriculum and the general curriculum management of the C.

(A) Evidence No. 1 4 pages). (b)

1) The Ministry of Education conducted an investigation of the situation in the C University from March 21, 2018 to March 28, 2018, and requested an intervenor to “serious Disciplinary Action against the Plaintiff” (Evidence No. 7, 11, B, and 11 of the A), and the Intervenor’s Teachers’ Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee (hereinafter referred to as “ Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee”), respectively.

On August 14, 2018, the Ministry of Education passed a resolution for reprimand (No. 2, 50) against the plaintiff (No. 2, 50) on August 14, 2018, which was subject to disciplinary action against the plaintiff on August 29, 2018.

‘For reasons, there was procedural defect in enacting and amending the Regulations of the New School Committee (unfairly enacted or amended regulations, such as the Regulations of the New School Committee) without undergoing deliberation by the Teaching Council or the Teaching Council, and in order to ensure fairness and transparency than others (unfair admission process for graduate schools).