1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim and the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s counterclaim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit;

A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs and the Defendant’s 1 met, around May 2013, Plaintiff B met with the Defendant on the basis of the introduction by the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch

Plaintiff

A and the defendant have developed from October 2015 to the relationship of annual relations.

B. The Plaintiffs’ monetary support 1) The Defendant was preparing for the tax accountant examination, etc. at the time of delivery with the Plaintiffs. (2) The Plaintiff B provided cash or cash support to the Defendant during delivery with the Defendant, allowing the Defendant to use the credit card under the Plaintiff B’s name.

3) The Plaintiff also paid the money that the Defendant needs to pay to the Defendant in cash during the period of delivery with the Defendant. C. The Plaintiffs’ criminal complaint 1) knew that the Defendant did not meet the Plaintiffs at the same time, the Plaintiffs demanded the Defendant to write down her early December 16, 2017, with his/her mother in Busan document, and to pay the money that the Defendant received from the Plaintiffs.

2) On June 17, 2018, the Plaintiffs filed a complaint against the Defendant with an investigative agency on charges of fraud, and revoked the complaint. 3) On July 11, 2018, the Prosecutor of the Busan District Prosecutors’ Office dismissed the Defendant on the grounds that it is impossible to find out the substantive truth without the Plaintiffs’ statement or assistance.

(Supplementary District Prosecutors' Office 2018No. 17947). [Reasons for Recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1, the result of the defendant's examination, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiffs began with the Defendant’s active teaching system, and maintained Man-Nam, who was born on the premise of marriage.

However, for about two years, the defendant is simultaneously holding two plaintiffs.