1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are parents of the network D (hereinafter “the deceased”), and the Defendant has taught from around 2009 with the deceased.

B. On July 22, 2013, at around 21:40, the Deceased was carrying the Defendant on the E-car and arrived at the G street located in F in the Suwon-gu, Busan, and went out of the car. The Deceased was on board the Defendant at the top of the car operation, and the Deceased was on board the back seat immediately.

After that, the defendant was coming back to another place from the passenger car on the side of the passenger car, and returned to the above vehicle. As the deceased was found at the back of the above vehicle, the defendant requested the above training center entrance security room to help the above training center entrance security room, and the police assigned for special guard on duty in the guard room lost the leather stand in the part of the deceased.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Deceased immediately transferred to an I Hospital in H and died on August 13, 2017.

C. At the time of the instant accident, the Deceased served as a fixed-term sports teacher at an elementary school, and the Defendant served as a English teacher at a high school.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap's 1 through 4, and 6's evidence (including each number), the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The deceased and the defendant asserted that they were to enter into a matrimonial engagement, and they were to put together with the other party's family members, and they were to impose monetary burdens on the deceased for the defendant.

However, the defendant's family opposed to marriage by taking into account the occupation of the deceased, and the defendant demanded the dissolution of matrimonial engagement and made it difficult for the deceased.

At the time of the instant accident, when the Defendant was in existence with the Deceased, and the Defendant demanded the Deceased to destroy a matrimonial engagement, it would be sufficiently predicted that the Deceased would have been able to engage in an extreme act if he had to move to the back seat. In light of the time between the Deceased’s discovery and the time until the leather was unfolded, the Defendant was out of the train.