logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.02.16 2015고단209
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, with respect to Defendant B, the period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor on July 16, 2010 by the Jeonju District Court on July 16, 2010, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 16, 2010, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the preceding main prison on October 4, 2012. Defendant B was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor on August 22, 2013 at the preceding main district court on August 30, 2013; Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution with prison labor on August 30, 2013; Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution with prison labor on May 13, 2014; Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution with prison labor on May 21, 2014; Defendant B was sentenced to one year of suspension of execution with the same court on January 29, 2015.

[2] Defendant A conspired to acquire a loan by deceiving a capital-oriented company as if it actually purchases a cargo vehicle without the intention to actually purchase the cargo vehicle, Defendant B is a person who takes the role in document work for the loan, and Defendant B is a person who actually purchases the cargo vehicle to be provided as security.

Defendant

B On April 3, 2013, the first day of the first day of the second day of the aftermasan-gu, the first day of the next day of the coffee shop, after obtaining from Defendant A a certificate of his seal impression, etc. necessary to purchase the second half of the freight vehicle from Defendant A, the loan brokerage chain (ju) G employee, and the employees belonging to the victim non-S. (BS) Capital Co., Ltd. (BS) who are the installment financing loan company that received the documents through H confirmed whether they intend to actually purchase the freight vehicle by contact Defendant A by telephone, and the Defendant was actually seeking to purchase the freight vehicle as planned in advance.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim company as above, and the Defendants acquired the amount of KRW 49,062,645 from the victim company to the former North Bank account (Account Number: I) in the name of the Defendant B on April 5, 2013 and acquired it by transfer from the victim company.

"2015 Highest 2148".

arrow