A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant committed the crime against the victim D on December 6, 2009, within the F Office of the Victim’s Operation of the Victim E located in Busan Seo-gu, Busan, Seowon-gu, “The Defendant would have the H beam 2,00 tons of underground earth installed in the construction site of the new G building in Changwon-si, with the right to sell the H beam. In addition, this area became final and conclusive in our bank in order to invest 12 billion won in the form of a business fund. The building owner, H and the representative director of the IO corporation, which entered into the construction contract. The I representative director entered into the construction contract. However, the I representative director was J, but the actual representative was the K. The Plaintiff delegated this construction site to the M representative. L representative director “The L representative director would make a subcontract en bloc to the victim.”

However, the above H beamline 2,00 tons was owned by the owner, and the K representative director only delegated the construction work to K, and there was no fact that the construction work has been ordered to the M. Thus, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to collectively subcontract the H beam sales authority or the construction site.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received a total of KRW 202,00,000 from the victim on December 10, 2009, including the Defendant’s receipt of KRW 2.5 million from the victim on December 10, 209.

2. On February 10, 2010, the Defendant committed the crime against the Victim P, saying, “Around February 20, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim prior to the Gyeonggi-si Mapo-si, Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si, that “The inside of the Republic of Korea would lend his vehicle to the Busan Mapo-si. The home will make a four-day business report, and immediately return the vehicle.”

However, the defendant was thought to have the sales proceeds by disposing of the vehicle to a third party without the intention or ability to return the vehicle.

As above, the Defendant deceptioned the victim, and was issued by the victim with QM3 equivalent to the market price of KRW 14 million from the victim, and disposed of it to the third party.

3. On March 5, 2010, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim R was committed to the victim near the lower court located at the lower court’s lower court at around 15:00 on March 5, 2010.