Defendant

A Imprisonment for 8 months and 4 million won, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3 million won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 1 million won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a captain of G-ho, the main vessel of a large towing vessel G (H and 80 tons: H and 80 tons) and I (J and 80 tons.) A is a captain of G-ho, the main vessel of a group of vessels; Defendant B is a captain of I, the subordinate vessel of the above group of vessels; Defendant C is a radio operator of G-ho; Defendant C is the actual owner of G and I; and Defendant D is an employee of Defendant A and Defendant B.

1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint criminal conduct [2015 Godan1914] around September 20, 2015, Defendant A captured the low net fishing gear loaded in G on the sea of about five miles in the north east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the 5 miles of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the east of the 4.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to engage in the fishery by using a two-boatd vessel in a zone where two-boatd vessels are prohibited from operating.

2. Defendant A [2015 Height1914]

A. At around 12:35 on September 21, 2015, Defendant A violated the Fishing Vessels Act: (a) concealed and navigated the name of the vessel and the number of the vessel in a way that it makes it impossible to identify by leaving the name of the vessel marked on the side of the player in G with the steel plate and leaving the vessel license plate back to the vessel number plate in a way that it makes it impossible to identify the vessel, even though Defendant A received an order to stop the vessel for maritime inspection and search under Article 12 of the Marine Guard Act from L of the security guards belonging to the guard of the K Stopter, the security guards of the K Stopter, despite being ordered to stop the vessel for the purpose of marine inspection and search of the vessel in the sea area where the vessel is located in the 4-day area where fishing is closed

Accordingly, the above defendant is marked with the name of the fishing vessel.