1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 20, 2017, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a person with a professional ability to work as a mining source in the Korea Coal Corporation’s Domine Mining Center, etc., and applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant on April 11, 2018, on the examination of “the front floor heat of the front floor, the left-hand collision, the 5-6 plane escape certificate No. 6-7 of the Gyeong-gu, the Gyeong-gu, the Gyeong-gu, the Gyeong-gu, the Gyeong-gu, the Gyeong-gu, the Gyeong-gu, the Gyeong-gu, the Gyeong-gu, the 6-7 (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”).

B. On April 12, 2018, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to grant medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff on the grounds of the result of the deliberation by the Occupational Disease Determination Committee as follows.

As a result of the examination of relevant medical records and medical video data, the Medical Care Benefit Application for the Medical Care Benefit showed that there is a small number of opinions that the position of the superior is related to the duties due to chronic damage caused by the shoulder-line work for more than 32 years. However, it is difficult to recognize the relevance of duties as being diagnosed by a prosecutor conducted for a considerable period (7 years) after the completion of the duties. The majority of the members present present, and the number of members present present, “The protruding of protruding signboard escape from the 5-6th following the 5-6th following the 5-6th anniversary of the 5-6th following the 5th anniversary of the 5-6th anniversary of the 5th anniversary of the 5-6th anniversary of the 5th anniversary of the 5th anniversary of the 5th anniversary of the 5th anniversary of the 5th anniversary of the 5th anniversary of the 5-6th anniversary of the 5th anniversary of the 5-6th anniversary of the 5th anniversary of the 5th anniversary of the 5-6th anniversary of the 19th of the m.

C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed a request for examination to the Defendant, but the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for examination on September 13, 2018.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3 through 5, and Eul No. 2.