logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.01.07 2013고단2744
장물취득
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 13, 2013, the Defendant purchased 80,000 won and acquired stolen goods with knowledge of the fact that he was stolen from D’s name, the market value equivalent to 49,400 won, which is the ownership of the victim’s name, stolen from D.

2. On June 14, 2013, the Defendant purchased 20,000 won and acquired stolen goods with knowledge of the fact that he/she was stolen from G in the F Elementary School near the Dong-gu, Ansan-si, the market price of the victim’s name and in whose name and in whose name he/she was stolen from G, in an amount equivalent to 49,400 won.

3. On June 14, 2013, the Defendant purchased one unit of smartphone in the range of 399,300 won in the market value of the victim’s name, in the vicinity of I hotel located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, and acquired stolen goods by purchasing 23,000 won in a gallon block, which is the market value of the victim’s name, stolen from J.

4. On June 17, 2013, the Defendant purchased one ggal lusium lusium 69,600 won in the market value of the victim’s name and unclaimed box that he stolen from K, and acquired gal lusium lusium 69,600 won in 10,000.

5. On June 22, 2013, the Defendant purchased one unit of a gallononon-phone equivalent to KRW 865,700 in the market value of the victim’s name, who was stolen by L from L around the new training station located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and acquired stolen goods at KRW 100,000.

6. On June 22, 2013, the Defendant purchased one unit of a gallon-2 smartphone in an amount equivalent to 49,400 won in the market value of the victim’s name, who was stolen from M, and then stolen from M, and acquired stolen goods at 40,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of a copy of each Act or subordinate statute to the police interrogation protocol against D, G, J, K, L, or M;

1. In light of the fact that there is no record of the same kind of crime under Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act, the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act and the selection of punishment for the crime;

arrow