1. Defendant A

(a) The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

(b)Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who is aware of the divulgence of personal information, shall receive such personal information for profit or for any other wrongful purpose;

On August 2012, the Defendant was provided with approximately fifty thousand customers of credit card companies (name, resident number, cell phone number, address, workplace name, etc.) by informing H of the Defendant’s e-mail account and password for the purpose of loan brokerage, etc., despite having knowledge of the fact that H illegally collected personal information at the loan brokerage office of the Defendant’s management office located in Seocheon-gu G Building 401, Seocheon-gu Office for the purpose of loan brokerage, etc., and allowing H to conduct business by accessing the said e-mail.

On January 2013, the Defendant continued to receive approximately 50,00 credit card holders' personal information (name, resident number, cell phone number, address, workplace name, etc.) by the same method at the office of the first police officer.

As a result, the Defendant received individual personal information of about 10,00 credit card companies illegally collected twice in total from H for the purpose of using loan brokerage business, etc.

2. No one shall knowingly receive any divulged personal information for profit or any unlawful purpose;

On January 2013, the Defendant, who is engaged in loan brokerage business, was aware of the fact that H illegally collects personal information at the loan brokerage office located in Yongsan-gu Office of the Defendant’s 518, Young-gu Office for the purpose of loan brokerage business, and was provided with approximately 9,000 credit card holders’ personal information (name, resident number, cellular phone number, address, workplace name, etc.) by allowing H to access the above e-mail and conduct business.

The Defendant continued to use the same method in the office of the lowerman on January 2013.