1. The Defendant’s long-term care institution during the improvement order for the violation of the Social Welfare Services Act committed against the Plaintiff on January 17, 2018.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff received operating subsidies from the Defendant as social welfare corporations operating the Pakistan General Social Welfare Center (hereinafter referred to as the “instant social welfare center”), the Pakistan New Visit Care Institution (hereinafter referred to as the “instant medical care institution”), the children’s center in the Pakistan New Area (hereinafter referred to as the “child center”), the Pakistan New Child Care Center, and the Pakistan New Kindergartens in Busan Metropolitan City, and the Defendant received the total amount of the budget for operating subsidies from the Busan Metropolitan City, and delivered them to the social welfare corporations such as the Plaintiff.

B. On January 17, 2014, Busan Metropolitan City notified the Defendant of the details and terms and conditions of the grant of the operating subsidy of the social welfare center in January 17, 2014, the details of the grant were stated that personnel expenses, operating expenses, bathing projects, permanent rental programs, home care programs, and specialized projects are determined (in the case of the instant social welfare center, the amount of the subsidy was determined in terms of personnel expenses, operating expenses, and home care programs among the above details of the grant), and the “Notice of Decision on Grant of the grant of the subsidy” should prohibit the use of the subsidy for purposes other than designated purposes and manage the subsidy separately from the separate account.

C. On January 22, 2014, the Defendant: (a) notified the Plaintiff of the payment of operating expenses of a social welfare center in January 2014; (b) attached the details of the granting of operating expenses by the social welfare center in January 2014, which the Busan Metropolitan City notified the Defendant; and (c) provided that the subsidies may not be used for any other purpose due to the terms and conditions of granting, and may be recovered at the time of conversion into the use of the subsidies to another project

Since then, the Defendant sent the official document stating the above contents to the Plaintiff once a month. D.

On the other hand, the Defendant’s comprehensive audit results from Busan Metropolitan City on November 4, 2016, 12 times in total from August 2014 to April 2016.