A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a civilian military employee of the U.S. and the U.S. military employee, who was in a de facto marital relationship with the victim H from around 1997 to August 2008.

1. Around March 26, 2008, the Defendant forged private document: (a) entered the Defendant’s house located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I into a “written confirmation” under the title of “A” by means of a computer, “H and A verify that the ownership of the following land is joint ownership; and (b) at the same time, a decision is made with A to consult on all matters concerning future trade, development and disposal; and (c) the location and amount of the land

1. Ap, A: one billion won (Won 100,000,000), and H investment funds: one hundred and fifty million won (Won 150,000,000);

2. Apon K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, and investment funds: KRW 400,000 (Won 400,000,000), H investment funds: KRW 100,000 (Won 100,000,000) and “ties”:

1. A: 1/2,

2. H: Upon entering “1/2”, “processing method”, “after deducting taxes, expenses, and investment principal at the time of sale and purchase, the remaining profits shall be divided by 50%,” and “as of March 26, 2008,” the victim and the Defendant entered the name, resident registration number, and address of the victim and the Defendant, and then output them, affix their seals and the name of the victim prepared in advance to the victim’s name and affixed their seals to the victim’s name.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a “certificate”, which is a private document on the rights and obligations of the victim’s name.

2. On January 10, 2012, the Defendant submitted an application for provisional seizure on the land of Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-gun, through the employees of the public service center of the Jung-gu District District Court, which was 364, the Government-si, which was 364, and submitted an application for provisional seizure on the land of Gyeonggi-gun, via the employees of the public service center, whose name is unknown, to the public official in charge of the above court who was unable to know the forged fact with the supporting

Accordingly, the defendant exercised a written confirmation in the name of the victim, which is a forged private document.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the defendant's prosecution;

1. H.