1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 10,467,417 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 21,582,670 to Plaintiff B; and (c) from January 29, 2012 to each of the said money.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) The facts of recognition C are as follows: (a) around 08:15, January 29, 2012; (b) the D Scki bus for fishing (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

(i)A driver’s license and the driver’s license and the driver’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’s license holder’

) The left side part of the Defendant vehicle received as the front part of the front part of the Defendant vehicle, and caused the Plaintiff A to suffer a diver fry, such as cage cages, etc., and the Plaintiff B, the wife of the Plaintiff A, who was on the back part of the Plaintiff vehicle, suffered each of the closed plebral straws, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

(2) The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement on the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap's statements (including additional numbers), Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 8, 9, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident in this case as a mutual aid business operator.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. In addition to the matters stated separately under the scope of the Plaintiff’s liability for damages, it is identical to each of the pertinent items in the attached Table 1(A), and it shall be rejected that the Plaintiff’s assertion did not separately state.

1. The fact that the plaintiff paid KRW 3,051,285 of the hospitalization treatment expenses in the king treatment expenses to the Republic of Korea, A, and in an emergency department, the sum of KRW 1,428,710 of the outpatient treatment expenses, and KRW 4,66,595 of the pharmaceutical expenses is recognized, but it is difficult to distinguish the relevant treatment expenses from the relevant treatment expenses, and the other parts. The injury part or degree of the plaintiff's injury.