1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim extended at the trial room, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant.

1. As to this part of the Plaintiff’s grounds of appeal concerning the limitation of liability, the lower court’s determination on the limitation of liability is just even if the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal is not significantly different from the allegations in the lower court.

Therefore, this court's reasons for this part are the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The grounds for this part of the scope of the liability for damages are as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts which are dismissed or added as follows, and thus, they are cited as they are in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or additional parts] The calculation sheet of damages in attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance and the calculation sheet of future medical treatment expenses in attached Form 2 shall be applied respectively to the calculation sheet of damages in attached Form 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance and the calculation sheet

The third 18th 18th am the first 18th am "before the plaintiff reaches the age of 60".

The following details shall be added to the fourth five pages of the judgment of the first instance:

The plaintiff asserts that since he had obtained a certificate related to information and communication in 194 and engaged in information and communication-related professional from September 13, 1996 to the time of the accident in this case, the plaintiff asserts that the daily income should be calculated based on statistical income corresponding to "the male information and communication expert and technical worker with 10 years career or more" in the report on the fact-finding survey by employment type published by the Ministry of Employment and Labor.

However, according to the statement of No. 19, the submission of tax information to the head of Dongjak Tax Office of the first instance, and the purport of the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff’s reported income and actual income appears to significantly fall short of the above statistical income claimed by the Plaintiff in the trial, and otherwise, at the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff was actually in fact at the time of the instant accident.