logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.10.18 2017고단4246
모욕등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In around 02:45 on April 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the DNA 21 heading room located in C8 on the 119th floor, stating that “the male projector is self-employed by calling in a philopon;” and (b) the victim F, a police official belonging to the police station located in the police station located in the Modong-dong Police Station in the Modong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu (hereinafter referred to as “the victim” was exposed to the said 112 reporter G, etc., thereby openly insulting the victim by saying “

2. The Defendant: (a) committed assault, at the time, and at the place of paragraph (1) at the time, by arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender under the suspicion described in paragraph (1) of this paragraph, who is a police officer belonging to the E District Police Station in the Sungdong Police Station E District; and (b) resulting in the Defendant’s assault, i.e., taking the Defendant’s bath on the part of his head on the part of the police station.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the control of crime such as arrest of police officers in the act of crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and I;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Based on the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable condition: The defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake.

There is no record of punishment as a violation of imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment or the execution of public duties.

The defendant is suffering from a yellow disorder and symptoms of alcohol dependence, resulting in the crime of this case.

arrow