logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원경주지원 2015.03.24 2014가단5909
공유물분할
Text

1. The real estate listed in the separate sheet shall be in order of each point of 10, 11, 12, 13, and 10 indicated in the separate sheet among K in the racing-si.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 6/38 shares of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) were owned by M was originally owned by M, but M died on March 5, 1995, and the Defendants inherited one-seven shares of each of the above shares, and the remaining 22/38 shares are owned by the Plaintiff.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendants did not reach an agreement on the method of partition of the instant building.

【Reasons for Recognition】 Each entry and whole purport of pleading of Evidence Nos. 3, 6 through 17 (including paper numbers)

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the Plaintiff and the Defendants shared the instant building, and the parties did not reach an agreement on the method of partition of the instant building. Thus, the Plaintiff may file a claim against the Defendants for partition of the instant building, which is jointly owned.

Furthermore, with respect to the method of partition of the building of this case, each warehouse of this case among the buildings of this case seems to have an economic utility that can be independently used and traded. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's share of 10, 11, 12, 13, and 10 of the annexed drawing among K was not jointly owned by 330 square meters in the ship (i) part of the above 330 square meters in the ground reinforced concrete structure, splate roof, one story, and 330 square meters in the middle of the building of this case is owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's share of 2,3,4, 12, 11, and 2 of the annexed drawing among K was not jointly owned by the defendant's 12,500 square meters in the first place of pleading, the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's assertion that the above 12, the plaintiff's evidence No.

arrow