logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.06.17 2015나103096
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added in the trial are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

Basic Facts

C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) is a corporation incorporated on January 26, 2005 for the purpose of wholesale and retail business of chemical products, petroleum products, etc.

The defendant was appointed as the director of C on April 19, 2005, and on December 21, 2005, he was appointed as the representative director of C.

On December 2, 2005, the Plaintiff remitted KRW 100,000,00 to the Defendant’s corporate bank account.

The Plaintiff was transferred KRW 29,00,000 from July 10, 2006 to February 7, 2007 to the Plaintiff’s Han Bank account as follows.

On July 10, 200, 100 E 5,000,000 E on August 22, 2006, 2003 F 5,000,000 on September 25, 2006, G 5,000,000 on October 21, 2006, G 5,000,000 on May 21, 2006, KRW 3,000,000 on November 29, 2006, F 3,000,00,000,00 on January 2, 200, 200, 30,000 on the day when the Defendant’s corporate bank account was deposited in F 3,00,00,000 won on February 7, 200, 205, 300, 305,000 C20.

In addition, on December 6, 2015, the sum of KRW 98,000,000, 22,000, 31,000,000 in K Co., Ltd., and KRW 17,00,000 in K Co., Ltd., and KRW 28,00,000 in K Co., Ltd., and KRW 28,00,000 in K Co., Ltd. were paid to K, and the said money was returned to C’s corporate account on the same day. Since then, the said money was used from the corporate account.

[Ground] The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff asserted that Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul's evidence Nos. 1 and 1, and the plaintiff's main claim for the whole pleadings may receive interest of KRW 5,00,000 per month from the defendant who operates Eul if he lends KRW 100,000,000 to the defendant who operates Eul. On December 2, 2005, the plaintiff lent KRW 100,000 to the defendant on December 2, 2006 as interest rate of KRW 5,00,000 per month. Thus, the defendant is obligated to repay the above loan to the plaintiff.

The defendant's assertion 100,000,000 won is not the loan but the C has received lubrication from H.

arrow