logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.10.12 2017고정1158
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a proxy driver who is engaged in driving a B-A-D motor vehicle.

On March 10, 2017, the Defendant driven a car with the above Amila on the 03:15th day of March, 2017, and led to the front distance in front of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C to the 1st day of the Dong community service center, which is the 1st day of the Dong Council.

At night, the traffic is controlled by means of the traffic signal at night, and in such a case, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering and brakes according to the signals of the traffic signal apparatus and by accurately manipulating the steering and brakes according to the signals of the traffic signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and passed the above shooting distance in the yellow on-and-off new line due to the negligence of proceeding with the red on-and-off new line, and received the part of the victim D (23 ) driving in the right side of the defendant's driving direction, which was the front part of the driver's seat of the motor vehicle in the above Ari-ridi vehicle.

The Defendant: (a) caused the injury to the Victim F (L, 44 years old) on the part of the Defendant’s occupational negligence to the victim F (V) who was on a AWD car for about two weeks of treatment; (b) the injury to the bridges and tensions that require approximately two weeks of treatment; (c) other bridges that require approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim D; and (d) the injury to the victim G (L, 24 years of age) who was on the said AWD car with approximately two weeks of treatment; and (e) the injury to the bridges and tensions that require approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The first written protocol concerning D concerning suspect examination of the police;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a traffic accident report, a traffic accident report, an investigation report (verification of an accident vehicle), an investigation report (verification of a motor vehicle screen image) (verification of an investigation report) and an investigation report (verification of a motor vehicle screen of an Aburged vehicle), and an investigation report (Submission of a diagnosis report) (Submission of a diagnosis report);

1. Article 3(1) and (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning criminal facts.

arrow