A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with B's cryp tropha written cryp.

On December 13, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at around 23:30 on December 13, 2015, and led to the driving of the training institute, which is located in the Gu Wondong-dong of a member of the Gyeonggi-si in Gyeonggi-si, along the two-lanes from the narrow trim distance to the elementary area.

At the time, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving safely and safely, such as reducing the speed to a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle and checking whether another motor vehicle in the signal waiting in the frontline is in the front line, since it was at night and there was an intersection with a traffic signal apparatus at that time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and driven at the front of the Defendant’s driving vehicle, while driving in front of the signal signal at the front of the Defendant’s driving direction, led the Defendant to shock the back door of the E-motor vehicle’s HH (A6) car in front of the Defendant’s driving, which was in front of the Defendant’s driving route, and the waves generated therefrom were scattered, and the left-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-on signal at one lane, and three-lanes of the G Driving, which was in front of the Defendant’s driving at the right side of the vehicle, respectively.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim C’s injury, such as salt, tensions, etc. in the front line of the border area, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence as above, and at the same time destroyed the Plaintiff’s mond vehicle in an amount equivalent to KRW 9,200,00 at the market price to the extent that the vehicle should be scrapped, and destroyed the said mond vehicle with the seal of KRW 951,949 with the repair cost of KRW 951,99 with the seal of the plate, etc., and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim, even though the Defendant destroyed the said mond vehicle to the extent that the repair cost is not reasonable.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C.