logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.05.27 2016고정442
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 31, 2015, the Defendant appears to have long time in the “E EM” operated by the victim D in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, on the ground that he did not refund the cultural merchandise coupon to the victim during the dispute with the wife F, and that he did not refund the cultural merchandise coupon.

The door will be closed immediately.

Pursuant to funeral services, whether or not.

Each funeral service shall be immediately rendered

h. He would have known that he would be engaged in funeral in this Netherlands;

It shall be accompanied by the East Nemanism.

I will write my writing on the Internet by us.

A report is filed with the Consumer Soirs Center.

It is necessary to attend the church and to write questions to the church.

A complaint is filed for the acquisition of stolen property.

“In doing so, it interfered with the business of the victimized person by force, such as prohibiting visitors who wish to enter the said marina by avoiding the disturbance, and thus obstructing the victimized person’s marina business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. D’s legal statement (the defendant and his defense counsel did not reach the degree of power of force)

The argument is asserted.

In full view of the following circumstances, i.e., that the injured person took a serious bath from the Defendant’s wife and the Defendant’s wife; that at the time, the injured person informed the Defendant of the circumstance that he could not refund cultural merchandise coupons, but the Defendant continued to take the victim’s bath, etc.; and that the victim did not have any employee other than the victim at the time, and it appears that there was no other means to avoid other than reporting the Defendant’s act to the police, it is reasonable to deem the Defendant’s act stated in the facts charged

Therefore, we cannot accept the above argument.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

arrow