Text
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a music teacher working at C secondary school. On May 25, 2012, the Defendant was a student who continued to leave the school on May 25, 2012 due to the son’s coarcing of the victim D (the age of 15). The Defendant changed the phrase “I amb, I amb,” and the victim changed the phrase “I amb, I am.”
1. On May 25, 2012, around 08:40 on May 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) taken the victim’s head, seated within the third grade class class class E of the Daejeon Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, as a hand, leading up to approximately 25 meters in front of the school room.
2. On May 25, 2012, at around 12:40 on May 25, 2012, the Defendant used the victim’s hair to knee in a school room, such as paragraph (1), and used the victim’s hair to commit assault on three occasions by kneeing the victim’s head twice.
3. On May 25, 2012, around 13:40 on May 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) in a place like paragraph (2) and threatened the victim, as if he were fluencing the victim, and (b) assaulted the head of the flucing hand by using the flucing hand on three occasions; (c) after the brucing, the Defendant
4. On May 2012, the Defendant: (a) taken a photo from a G arboretum located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon; (b) did not have a victim, who was the head of the Ban; (c) did not take a photograph; and (d) did not take the victim; and (d) did assault the victim at the right frame of the victim’s right frame due to the departure of the wharf at the price of one time.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Legal statement of witness D;
1. Some statements concerning the suspect examination protocol of the defendant;
1. Determination as to the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel in each part of the H and I statements
1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in the course of correcting the wrong words and behavior of the victim and giving instructions to the victim who did not properly comply with the defendant's legitimate instructions. Thus, the defendant's act does not contravene social norms.