logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.07.16 2013고단424
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the head of the room of the "G Pcception room" on the second floor of the building located in the F in Ansan-gu, Ansan-si, and the defendant A is the head of the business of the above Cception room.

1. A game products related business entity shall not allow others to gamble, perform other speculative acts, or leave them unattended so that they may do so by using the game products;

From early November 2012, 2012 to December 20:00, the Defendants installed nine computers in the aforesaid scambling room. The Defendants provided the said scambling game money to many unspecified customers, who found the said scambling game site, with the ID and password of the gambling game site, provided them with 10,000 won of cash 10,000 won of the 10,000 won of the scambling game site, and provided them with a 10,000 won of the 10,000 won of the scambling game site by accessing the scambling game site. After doing the game, the Defendants exchanged 10,000 won per 10,000 won of the scambling game money to customers who completed the game.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit speculative acts using the above gambling game site.

2. No one shall distribute or use game products the contents of which are different from the classification obtained by the Game Rating Board;

The Defendants offered “I” game products different from the classification received by using a manager page to customers, such as filling game money or filling game money exceeding 300,000 won per year, even though the said “I” game products do not have a manager page from the Game Rating Board, and even if it was rated that the game money cannot be charged beyond the limit of 300,000 won per year, the Defendants offered “I” game products to customers without their names.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide game products with contents different from the contents of the rating classification.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants.

arrow