logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2016.11.16 2016고정286
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 8, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) at the Cheongju District Court on September 8, 2016 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 20, 2016.

No one shall provide game products, the contents of which are different from the classification obtained, for distribution or use, display or keep them for such purposes, and shall exchange, exchange, arrange for exchange or repurchase the results of tangible or intangible obtained through the use of game products.

Nevertheless, at around 19:40 on March 13, 2015, the Defendant used the Internet game of “propat” for the purpose of using eight computers installed in the game site of “E” operated by D in Suwon-si, Suwon-si to many and unspecified customers who find there there, such as Baduk, spawn and spawn, etc., within the limit of 300,000 won per month, the above game money can be charged only by mobile payment, real-time account transfer transfer account, gift certificates, coophone, and indirect method, the game money cannot be charged directly in cash, points or game money cannot be charged as a result of the success of the game, and it is impossible to transfer the game money between the users within the game, but the game money cannot be charged directly with the money without limit of 300,000 won per day, and the game money was charged directly to customers through money exchange 100,000 won per day.

As a result, the defendant in collusion with D, provided customers with contents different from the contents of the rating classification, and exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the third trial date);

1. The police of D. D.

arrow