A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 15, 2018, the Defendant damaged property: (a) around 07:15, the mother of the Defendant, who is the mother of the Defendant in the Gu apartment B apartment C during the Ansan-si of Gyeonggi-do, laid down the wind gate owned by the victim in the living room on the ground that the victim was unable to enter his/her own horse, and laid down the wind gate on the floor; (b) made a hole inside the wall of the living room in the management of the victim on the ground that he/she was fluor of the victim’s mother, who was the mother of the Defendant in the Gu B apartment C; and (c) made it difficult for him/her to break up with the dried stand

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property so that the amount of repairs is not reasonable.

2. On September 4, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around September 19:18, 2018, while operating a passenger car on the front of the F police box located in the Gu E during the Ansan-si of Gyeonggi-do, brought an objection against the police officers who received a disposition of penalty disposition from G police officers who were subject to the said police box’s disposition of penalty disposition.

After receiving the above disposition of notification, the Defendant committed an act of obstruction of the performance of official duties against H, while resisting about 8 minutes that he was able to leave the said box, not to throw away the tobacco, and then she was able to see that the chief of the police box affiliated with the above box was the Defendant at around 19:26 on the same day, and that the Ha read that “the Defendant was a shot winner with tobacco,” and assaulted the head on the ma of the above Ha.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning civil petition counseling duties of police officials.

B. The Defendant’s obstruction of performance of official duties against I is above A.

In order to prevent an act of violence by putting the shoulder and arms of the defendant, a police officer affiliated with the above police box, immediately after the crime was committed as mentioned in the above paragraph, assaulted at one time the chest part of the above I with his arms.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning suppression of crime by police officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to D, I, and H;

1. On-site and photographs of damage;

1. The suspect;