logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.15 2017고단491
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 12, 2017, at around 20:35, the Defendant: (a) was placed in front of the Dong and apartment house located at 23-26, a Cheongwon-si, Youngwon-si, 2017, which was 173-26, and (b) was placed in front of the Dong and Dong, and (c) the Defendant, a police officer of the Suwon-gu, Police Station B, who was called up after receiving 112, attempted to throw the breath of alcohol while drinking; and (d) was laid down in the above C’s chest.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of crimes and the prevention of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the police statement D to the defendant's legal statement C, each statement of 112 declarations E to the defendant's legal statement D, pictures of damage, and application of statutes on site pictures;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The criminal liability for committing a crime by force against a police officer who performs his/her duty with legitimate reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is minor;

subsection (b) of this section.

There is a record of being fined two times for violent crimes, such as violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and the crime of destroying property.

However, it is an contingent crime, and the degree of interference with the execution of official duties is serious.

In light of the fact that it is difficult to see the fact that there is a mistake and reflects the fact that the previous conviction was in the past ten years or more, the fine is selected, taking into account other factors which are conditions for sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, and the punishment shall be determined as per the order.

arrow