Defendants shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

On July 2015, Co-Defendant C, before separation, made a false statement to the victim F in E coffee shop located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, 2015, that “it is possible to impose a lot of money when operating a marina shop. It is possible to take over 200 million won, such as where there is a massage shop located in the intermittent value, and one hundred million won is invested and jointly accepted, and the profits are divided in half and half. Correspondence will only manage books and operate it.”

However, C did not have the intent or ability to pay the proceeds according to the agreement even if it did not have any specific property at the time and received money from the victim under the pretext of investment in the massage place, even if it did not have any property at the time.

C In such a case, around July 22, 2015, by deceiving the victim, the victim was transferred to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of G used by the defendant, and around July 25, 2015, the amount of KRW 60 million was transferred to the same account and KRW 35 million was transferred to the same account around July 25, 2015 and received KRW 95 million.

1. Defendant A is the follow-up service of the above C.

On January 2016, the Defendant requested C to “a vehicle under the police investigation due to the fact that the internal house is being kept in the face of money at the present, so that the police investigation was requested to change the vehicle under the four name. Around that time, the Defendant allowed C to siren a H rocketing car under the name of the Defendant and use it for C, and continuously around March 2016, the Defendant used IK5 car under the name of the Defendant again in the name of the Defendant.

As such, the Defendant, despite being aware that C was a person who commits a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, sent the said vehicles to the Defendant, thereby allowing C to flee under the name of the Defendant.

2. Defendant B is the friendship of the above C.

On May 2016, the Defendant received a request from C to “on the basis of the fact that he is currently under the police investigation due to the fact that he is currently under the fact that he is under the investigation of money at the beginning of the beginning of May 2016, the Defendant leased studio in four names,” and