beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On May 16, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for an attempted larceny, etc. at the Busan District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on January 10, 2019.
【Criminal Facts】
International telecommunications financial fraud (hereinafter referred to as “scams”) organization, which acts at home and abroad, takes part in each of the roles, such as “total liability” which manages the overall crime of fraud, “book” which operates call centers in a foreign non-commercial area, and “inducing” which allows victims to pay the money for the repayment of existing loans to financial institutions by misrepresenting them to the employees of financial institutions, and “the liability for collection and remittance” which collects and transfers the money kept by the victims to the account, and is operated in the form of an investigative agency in preparation for the tracking of the investigative agency. The Defendant, who takes charge of the “collection and remittance” role, committed the scams fraud in order to commit the scams with other under-name officers.
1. On March 26, 2019, in accordance with the above public offering, the Defendant: (a) misrepresented the financial institution in the absence of the intent or ability to prevent the loan; and (b) made the phone call to the victim B; and (c) falsely stated that “if the existing loan is repaid, it shall be delivered in cash. However, the existing loan repayment must be delivered in cash; and (d) made the victim prepare for the payment in cash of the existing loan repayment amounting to KRW 15.9 million.”
At around 20:00 on March 26, 2019, the Defendant: (a) received an instruction from an unqualified person in front of the D Elementary School located in Scheon-si C through E; and (b) received an amount of KRW 15.9 million from the victim, and deposited the said amount of damage into the account designated by the winners of the name.
As a result, the defendant was provided property by deceiving the victim in collusion with the employees of scaming in person.
2. The name not entered in the attempted fraud;