Text
[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the above sentence shall be executed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A around April 12, 2020, around 01:37, at the restaurant of “D” located in Busan Jung-gu, Busan, the Defendant had the friendship of other customers, and attached a vision with the behaviors of the customers.
Accordingly, the police officer F of the Busan Central Police Station Estation and the police officer G of the Busan Central Police Station called up to 112 and recommended the Defendant to return home, and the Defendant sent back to the police station and recommended the Defendant to return home, and the Defendant saw her knife, her knife knife knife knife knife knif
As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.
2. On April 12, 2020, around 01:37, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender committing an offense, such as the facts stated in paragraph (1) before the restaurant as indicated in paragraph (1); (b) arrested a flagrant offender, and prevented him from carrying on the patrol vehicle; (c) opened the her mother and her flaps, opened his her flaps, and assault G by breaking his flaps with two descendants.
As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties on the arrest of police officers in flagrant offenders.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning G police statements;
1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment: Articles 136(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment
1. The Defendants in a suspended sentence: The following should be considered: (a) assaulted police officers performing their duties on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; and (b) the nature of the offense is not good; (c) the Defendants’ criminal records; (d) the degree of the assault