logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.08.20 2015고단1054
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, at the construction site of the issuance of the visa, frequently contacted the daily workers from the shipbuilding yard, and knew that it would be an illegal Stayer due to the problem of the extension of the visa, and knew that he would be an illegal Stayer, he would make the visa extension and the application for the sovereignty on behalf of the visa with the knowledge that the period of validity of the visa is imminent, thereby deceiving the visa to acquire money from them.

On June 2014, the Defendant against the victim C, who was aware of the fact that he was working for the daily worker at the construction site at the site of a place not adjacent to the place, was a victim C, and the victim was aware of the expiration of the employment visa period, and there is no problem that he was newly issued the visa to the victim. The victim is also a head of the Seoul Immigration Control Office, which is able to give a special permanent residence in the Republic of Korea. And the Seoul Immigration Control Office also is a head of the Gu. And the phone calls, and the phone calls to the victim, who want to be able to attend the house and be able to faithfully and be able to take the house. In addition, four wanted to have the child and be able to do so. It is also said that the non-natural site and the military sovereignty can also be issued.”

However, in fact, the defendant was not an employee of the Suwon Immigration Office and was not in a position to exercise influence over the issuance of visa, as well as the defendant has no kind of relationship with the Seoul Immigration Office, and the defendant is unable to exercise any influence on the Immigration Office for the issuance of visa by the victim, and even if he was paid money from the victim for the issuance of visa, he did not have the intention or ability to extend the period of visa for the victim or to help the issuance of the permanent sovereignty.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it from July 18, 2014 to the same year as the victim's list Nos. 1 of the crime list in attached Form 1.

9. By the end of 27.

arrow