The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the following facts can be fully acknowledged: (a) Defendant B used the victim E’s shoulder, traw, and traw, as indicated in the facts charged in the instant case; and (b) Defendant A used the traw of the said victim on a miscellaneous floor to put the victim’s belf on the miscellaneous floor, and divide the victim’s busbus with buss, thereby causing an injury to the buss busf.

Nevertheless, the lower court rendered a not-guilty verdict on all the charges of this case against the Defendants. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal doctrine, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion

2. In light of the records, a thorough examination of the evidence of this case is not sufficient to recognize that the court below, on the date and time stated in the facts charged of this case, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, based on the reasons stated in its reasoning, used by the defendant B to assault the victim's her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

3. Accordingly, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.