logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.16 2014고정3245
조세범처벌법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 22, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and four months by committing a crime of violating the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act at the Seoul Central District Court on August 2, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 30, 2014.

1. On July 25, 201, the Defendant submitted a list of total tax invoices by false seller in collusion with B, and around July 25, 201, at D offices located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and D 1, 2011, the Defendant filed a list of total tax invoices by customer, stating in Gangnam-gu, the false statement in the list of total tax invoices by customer, including the false statement in the list of tax invoices by customer, as if he supplied goods or services equivalent to the same amount, even though he did not have supplied goods or services in the amount of KRW 270 million to E., and submitted a false statement in the list of total tax invoices by customer as if he supplied goods or services equivalent to KRW 652 million by customer.

2. In collusion with B on January 25, 201, the Defendant submits a false list of supply values of KRW 156 million in total, as shown in attached Table 2 No. 1, such as falsely entering the list of supply values in the list of tax invoices by seller as if he/she was supplied with goods or services equivalent to KRW 56 million in total, and submitting Gangnam-do tax invoice by entering it in the list of tax invoices by seller as shown in attached Table 2 No. 1, such as falsely entering the list of supply values in the list of tax invoices by seller, and submitting Gangnam-do tax invoice by entering it in the list of tax invoices by seller as if he/she was supplied with goods or services equivalent to KRW 849 million in total, as shown in attached Table 2, as if he/she were supplied with goods or services in the list of tax invoices by seller.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. All the horses to B;

1. A letter of investigation;

1. A written accusation;

arrow