logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2019.10.17 2019고단792
조세범처벌법위반
Text

Defendant

Punishment against A shall be six months, and the punishment against Defendant B shall be 10,000,000 won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the actual operator of Defendant B, Inc. in South-gu at port, and Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing, supplying, selling, etc. products by sixping.

1. Defendant A

A. A. Around September 30, 2017, the Defendant issued a false tax invoice of KRW 915,00,000,000 in total supply value, as shown in the separate sheet of crime (1), from that time until December 31, 2017, including the issuance of a false tax invoice of KRW 915,00,000, in total, as shown in the separate sheet of crime (1) by December 31, 2017, although the Defendant did not supply the goods or services to D Co., Ltd., even though he did not supply the goods or services to D.

B. On November 10, 2017, the Defendant received a false tax invoice of KRW 465,909,000 in total of supply values, as shown in the separate sheet of crime (2) from December 31, 2017, including the receipt of a false tax invoice of KRW 225,000,000, which entered as if he had not been supplied with goods or services by the said office E, even though he had not been provided with goods or services from the said corporation E, and received three copies of a false tax invoice of KRW 465,90,00 in total of supply values from that time.

C. On January 17, 2018, the Defendant submitted a false list of total tax invoices by seller to the B offices of the said Co., Ltd., without being supplied with goods or services from E, and submitted the list of total tax invoices by seller to the B offices of the said Co., Ltd., as if the supply price was supplied with goods or services equivalent to KRW 225,00,000.

2. The Defendant Company B, a real operator of the Defendant, issued and received a false tax invoice with respect to the Defendant’s business as described in paragraph 1, and submitted a false list of individual tax invoices by seller.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1.The police of F. F.

arrow