Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 2014, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim F by saying “F typ feas, feas, feas, feas, feas, feas, feas, feas, feas, feas, feas, feas, feas, feas, f9.”

2. On November 2014, at the entrance of the community center located in Gangnam-si G around Gangnam-si, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by stating that “F is replaced by the fraud that has been committed in inside, and that “F is a flag,” among the community residents gather, to an unspecified resident of the community.”

3. Around February 2014, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by stating that “FF’s typule, fraudulent typule, guest guee, and gue gue gue gue gue, should see the victim’s fump with the victim’s name-free resident and H,” and publicly insulting the victim.

4. Around March 7, 2015, the Defendant insultingd the victim publicly by saying, “F is a feasible fe in a village, and Domine, Domine, Domine, Domine, Domine, Domine, Dominant, Dominant, Dominant, and Domine, Dominant, Dominant, and Domine, which were d

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim four times in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness I and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (resident statements);

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.