logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.11.28 2014고단2867
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 27, 2014, the Defendant causing property damage: (a) around 04:30 on April 27, 2014, the Defendant received a request from an employee under his/her name, for the payment of the drinking value from the following day after he/she received a request for the payment of the drinking value from the employee under his/her name, when he/she had a victim D (ma, 32 years of age) located in Ulsan-gu C

The defendant stated that "the president is a relative, who is the president's relative, and the president makes a request for continuous change in the drinking value without complying with it," and that the above employee refused to pay the drinking value, while the above employee appears to report to the police 112, the above employee was able to report the 112 of the victim's market price at hand, and the following floor was collected.

Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed the parts owned by the victim.

2. The Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) appears to have known that the Defendant did not pay the drinking value at the same time and place as stipulated in Paragraph (1) of the same Article; (b) the background leading up to the Gandong Police Station I District of the Ulsan East Police Station, which called the Defendant, tried to confirm the circumstances of the instant case against the said employee; (c) “I Chewing” was sound, and was drinking as if he were the said employee.

The Defendant tried to stop the Defendant’s above acts, and, in the past, the J and Assistant K tried to look back with the Defendant as “YY Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YG Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y fY Y fY fY fY hh hh h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the duty of reporting 112, a legitimate performance of police officers' official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow