A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:00 on December 10, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) and the Act on the Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) and the Defendant interfered with business, on the Defendant’s residence located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C apartment 110 dong 904, and on the ground that the Defendant’s son did not recognize the victim despite the Defendant’s assertion of the assault from the “F Child Care Center” operated by the victim E, the above G did not have committed the above assault, and even though the victim did not have attempted to avoid the assault, it is obvious that the above G used the above D assault, and as the victim was aware of the fact and attempted to conceal it, it was the head of the F Child Care Center, which was “Isle son’s child care center,” and “Isle 31,000 from that time it did not request the head of the child care center, and cV.”

As a result, the Defendant revealed openly false information through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victim, thereby impairing the honor of the victim, and at the same time spreading false information such as the parents of other originals who ask or release the victim as the child care center in the operation of the victim, thereby hindering legitimate business activities concerning the operation and solicitation of the victim.

2. On December 12, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) (hereinafter “Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection Act”) refers to the following originals: (a) the Defendant’s residence was above the Defendant; and (b) the Defendant did not have assaulted the said D; (c) as if it was evident that the Defendant used the said D