beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Plaintiff A is the trade name of “F Real Estate” in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si, the trade name of Plaintiff B, “G Real Estate Brokerage Office,” and Defendant C is one of the trade names of “H Licensed Real Estate Agent Office,” in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si.
B. On February 28, 2014, I entered into a sales contract with JJ to sell KRW 3,270,000,000 of the purchase price of KRW 719.8 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”) in Seocheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) and completed the registration of ownership transfer with J on April 10, 2014.
C. On April 23, 2014, Defendant C employed Defendant D as a broker assistant of the said brokerage office. On April 24, 2014, Defendant C transferred KRW 17,000,000 from I to Defendant D the brokerage commission of the instant sales contract and delivered it to Defendant D, and issued cash receipts under the name of H Licensed Real Estate Agents’ Office.
[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3-1, 2, 5, 20-2, 3, and 20-2, 20-3, and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. A. The summary of the Plaintiffs’ assertion: (a) around December 16, 2013 and February 5, 2014, Plaintiff B requested I to mediate the instant real estate by the owner of the instant real estate; and (b) requested Plaintiff A to jointly act as a broker for the instant real estate on February 18, 2014; and (c) on February 19 and February 20, 2014, Plaintiff A confirmed and explained the instant real estate to L who asked for the purchase brokerage of the instant real estate site, including commercial buildings, and stated the location, category, and size of the said real estate. Defendant D and E, who is not qualified as a licensed real estate agent, did not receive brokerage fees from I and J by mediating the instant sales contract on February 28, 2014, and Defendant C, as if he/she acted as a broker, was aware of the fact that he/she acted as a broker.