All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. On the summary of the reasons for appeal, the defendant asserts that the punishment imposed by the court below is too unfasible, and that the prosecutor is too unfasible and unfair.

2. There are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that there is a need for strict punishment against a person who participated in the judgment of telephone financial fraud crime, the Defendant withdraws or remits the money by deception, and the custody of several approaches to the crime of telephone financial fraud in a way that they can be used for the crime of telephone financial fraud, and the degree of participation is not less than that of such crime. On the other hand, the Defendant is against his mistake, and there is no criminal history, and there is no criminal history, and the Defendant paid a part of the amount of damage to the victim, and the victim does not want punishment against the Defendant.

In light of the above circumstances and other conditions of sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, circumstances leading to the commission of the crime, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too heavy or unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in entirety in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since it is not reasonable.