The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. There are favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant was the first offender, the mistake is against him, and the victim seems to be able to recover from the damage.

However, strict countermeasures are required against the crime of telephone financing fraud. Therefore, even if the role or gain acquired by the relevant participant is not significant, it is necessary to punish the relevant participant, and the defendant appears to have participated in the crime of telephone financing fraud for a considerable period of time, and in full view of various sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, and circumstances leading to the crime, it does not seem that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.