A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 23, 2015, at around 20:45, the Defendant expressed that “C” restaurant located in Syang City B, and that the Defendant 112 reported that he was under the influence of alcohol, and was asked questions about personal matters by E during the process of having been called out after receiving a report by the Defendant, that he was frighting to the said restaurant and talking to the customers, and that he was asked by E of the security guards belonging to the Stakyang Police Station D police box called “to singe, singe, sring, the police, sring, sring, etc.” on the hand floor of the above circumstances E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (it shall be considered that there is no special criminal record in addition to reflectivity, two times of fines, etc.);

1. Protective observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;