Of the cases No. 1411 of the High Order 2017, the Defendant committed each of the crimes in [Attachment 1-5] and [Attachment 2017 [Attachment 1-5] and [Attachment 1545].

Punishment of the crime

On June 29, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. by a military court of common military courts of the sixth Army, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 7, 2016.

[2017 Highest 1411] The Defendant called the victim D who became aware of while working in reserve service on the front day of the 125th day of the 2016 government city around the end of February, 2016, and called the victim D and became aware of the fact that the Defendant had been working in reserve service. “A large number in the course of studying abroad in Europe, and is well-known with the head of the E Asian team F.

When paying the necessary cost, it is intended to establish a corporation in the Red Congo and create and supervise the E-company account within one month.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, there was no fact that the Defendant was studying abroad, and there was no intention or ability to establish a corporate account by establishing a juristic person in Hong Congo within one month, even if the Defendant did not know of the F, which is the head of the E Asian team, and even if he did not receive money.

Nevertheless, on March 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received 4.80,000 won under the name of the Nonghyup Bank (Account Number: G) account in the name of the Defendant on March 3, 2016 from the victim by deceiving the victim as above; and (b) received the total amount of KRW 130,030,000 over six times, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

[2017 Highest 1545] On January 24, 2016, the Defendant would create a program for selling 3 million won Internet to the victim H in the apartment apartment shopping district located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon.

First of all, 1 million won was changed as down payment. "........"

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to produce the above Internet tugboat program.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and is on the same day under the name of the defendant.