beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Of the facts charged in this case, the victim C violated the Labor Standards Act.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2016 Highest 8778] The Defendant was operating with G, which is a school member located in the Republic of Korea (main week F; hereinafter “F”) located in the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D D D Building 402 (hereinafter “F”), and the fact was in a situation in which the attraction of students from Australia without any particular property incurred income only after attracting them. At the time, there was a situation in which the attraction of students from Australia was not carried out smoothly, and there was a situation in which there was a project cost for receiving investment money, and there was no intention or ability to provide the pertinent study program or training program even if the Defendant recruited the applicants, such as Australia or the program for study and training, from December 2, 2010 to August 2015, which did not meet the amount equivalent to KRW 95 million with business funds, etc.
Nevertheless, on January 30, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “If he/she registers a 2310,000 won or more, he/she applies for taking lectures at the STS vocational school located in Australia, he/she may make him/her attend the said school on his/her behalf, and may allow him/her to take on his/her job at the local level if he/she attends the said school and completed the education.”
Accordingly, around January 27, 2016, the Defendant received 1810,000 won from 7 victims in total from 16,170,000 won, such as the list in the attached crime list, from the victim I to the bank account (K) of J.
[2017 High Class 10] The Defendant operated the F with G, a wife, was in a situation in which there was only a lot of income by attracting students from Australia without any particular property, and the attraction of students from the time was not carried out smoothly. The Defendant was in a situation in which the attracting of students from the time of receiving investment funds was in charge of providing business expenses. Since from December 2010, the Defendant failed to repay the amount equivalent to KRW 95 million borrowed from the business funds, it is also a recruitment for the Australian study or training program provider.