1. As to the Plaintiff’s forest C, 186843 square meters of forest land in Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, 1973.

1. The Plaintiff indicating the claim is the owner of the forest of this case, which completed the registration of creation of superficies (the ownership and scope of standing timber: the entire land, the duration of the land from December 24, 1973, the superficies holder: the superficies holder: the Defendant completed the registration of creation of superficies (the ownership and scope of standing timber: the entire land: the ownership and the period of the land: the ownership of the forest from December 24, 1973; the superficies holder: the Defendant: the forest of this case: the forest of this case (hereinafter referred to as “the forest of this case”) on February 16, 1985, with No. 1312, which was received on February 16, 1985, for sale on February 15, 1973.

Since the above superficies on the forest of this case had expired due to the expiration of the duration, the defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for the cancellation registration of the above superficies creation to the plaintiff who is the owner of the forest of this case.

2. Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of the Acts (a written reply stating that the defendant is served with the complaint of this case and sought a judgment dismissing the plaintiff's claim, but the written reply does not clearly state the purport of clearly disputing the facts constituting the cause of the plaintiff's claim. Even thereafter, the defendant did not submit a preparatory document stating that the facts constituting the cause of the plaintiff's claim are clearly disputed, and did not dispute them during the preparatory date for pleading, and he did not appear on the date for pleading. Accordingly, the defendant did not appear on the date for pleading. Accordingly, it is deemed that the defendant led to