1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) 4,290,000 Won and its 2,860.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 3, 2018, the Plaintiff leased real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”) to the Defendant with a deposit of KRW 13 million, KRW 1.3 million per month, KRW 1.3 million per month, and the lease term from April 30, 2018 to April 29, 2021.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

At the time of the above contract, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed that “if the amount of the rent in arrears by the Defendant amounts to the three-year rent, the Plaintiff may terminate the lease contract.”

C. The Defendant delayed the rent of at least three (6.6.6, 2018, 2018.7., 2018.). D.

On January 30, 2019, the rent in arrears as of January 30, 201 is KRW 4,290,000.

(F) As between September 10, 2018 and December 31, 2018, the Defendant repaid that it is the vehicle from June 2018 to October 2018, and again, the Defendant is the vehicle from November 2018 to December 31, 2018.

C. On January 10, 2019, a duplicate of the complaint of this case, stating that the lease contract of this case is terminated on the ground of the rent delay mentioned in the port, reaches the Defendant.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 2, Eul Nos. 1, 2, and 1 and 2, the fact that the records are evident, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination, since the lease contract of this case was terminated on January 10, 2019, the defendant delivered the real estate of this case to the plaintiff. As to the overdue 4,290,000 won and the overdue 2,860,000 won (the rent of November 11, 2018, and December 2018) from January 11, 2019, which is the day following the delivery date of the duplicate of the complaint of this case, to the rent of 1,30,000 won (the rent of January 31, 2018) from January 31, 2019, which is the day following the day on which the rent of this case occurred to the plaintiff, the defendant is obligated to pay 5% per annum as prescribed in the Civil Act until July 17, 2019, which is reasonable to dispute the existence or scope of the obligation of each defendant to perform, and 12% per annum as prescribed in the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is the scope of the above recognition.